Skip to content
Model Comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5:
The Cheapest Models Compared 2026

GPT-4o mini at $0.15/M input vs Claude Haiku 4.5 at $0.25/M — which cheap model delivers better quality, speed, and value for high-volume production use?

9 min read·Updated April 2026
Quick Comparison
$0.15
GPT-4o mini input/1M
$0.25
Claude Haiku 4.5 input/1M
128K
GPT-4o mini context
200K
Claude Haiku 4.5 context

Full Pricing Comparison

FeatureGPT-4o miniClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini Flash 2.0
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.25$0.075
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.60$1.25$0.30
Context window128K200K1M
Prompt caching$0.075/M$0.025/MLimited
Batch API discount50% off50% off50% off
Vision (image input)YesYesYes

Quality Benchmarks: Where Each Model Wins

TaskGPT-4o miniClaude Haiku 4.5Winner
Classification and labelingVery goodVery goodTie
Long document analysisGood (128K)Excellent (200K)Haiku
Instruction followingGoodExcellentHaiku
JSON output reliabilityGoodExcellentHaiku
Math reasoningVery goodGoodGPT-4o mini
MultilingualExcellentVery goodGPT-4o mini

Cost at Scale: 1M Requests/Month

Typical customer support bot (200 tokens input, 150 tokens output per message):

  • GPT-4o mini: 200M × $0.15 + 150M × $0.60 = $30 + $90 = $120/month
  • Claude Haiku 4.5: 200M × $0.25 + 150M × $1.25 = $50 + $187.50 = $237.50/month
  • Gemini Flash 2.0: 200M × $0.075 + 150M × $0.30 = $15 + $45 = $60/month

When to Choose Each Model

Choose GPT-4o mini when: cost is primary, multilingual apps, math-heavy use cases, or you are already in the OpenAI ecosystem.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when: long documents (100K+ tokens), strict JSON output format, lower refusal rate needed, or Anthropic's safety alignment preferred.

Choose Gemini Flash 2.0 instead when: maximum cost efficiency, 1M+ context, or Google Cloud preferred.

Calculate Cost for Your Volume

Enter your expected monthly tokens and see the real cost difference between models.

AI Cost Calculator