Skip to content
Provider Comparison

OpenAI vs Anthropic Pricing 2026:
GPT-6 vs Claude 5.5 Full Comparison

Complete pricing comparison between OpenAI (GPT-6 Luna, GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Astra) and Anthropic (Claude Haiku 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5, Fable 5.1) across tiers, context windows, batch pricing and caching. Includes which provider wins by use case. Last verified: 2026-10-16.

11 min read·Updated October 2026
Short Answer — October 2026

It depends on the tier and the prompt length. At the budget end the list prices now match: GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5 both cost $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens, though Haiku 5.5 rises to $0.50/$2.50 for prompts over 100K tokens. In the middle the two are also identical — GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 both cost $2/$10. At the premium end Anthropic is cheaper: Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/$20 versus $10/$50 for GPT-6 Astra, while the top models (Astra and Claude Fable 5.1) match at $10/$50.

Model Tier Comparison — Standard Pricing

TierOpenAI ModelInput / 1MOutput / 1MAnthropic ModelInput / 1MOutput / 1M
BudgetGPT-6 Luna$0.10$0.50Claude Haiku 5.5*$0.10$0.50
MidGPT-6.1 Sol$2.00$10.00Claude Sonnet 5.5$2.00$10.00
PremiumGPT-6 Astra$10.00$50.00Claude Opus 5.5$4.00$20.00
FrontierGPT-6 Astra$10.00$50.00Claude Fable 5.1$10.00$50.00

* Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10/$0.50 for prompts up to 100,000 tokens, $0.50/$2.50 above. It replaced Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1/$5), now a legacy model.

OpenAI has three current GPT-6 models and Anthropic four, so Astra appears against both Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1. GPT-6 prices apply up to 272K input tokens; longer prompts cost 2× input and 1.5× output.

Batch API Pricing Comparison

ModelBatch Input / 1MBatch Output / 1MSavings vs Standard
GPT-6 Luna (batch)$0.05$0.2550% off standard
GPT-6.1 Sol (batch)$1.00$5.0050% off standard
GPT-6 Astra (batch)$5.00$25.0050% off standard
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch, ≤100K prompt)$0.05$0.2550% off standard
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch)$1.00$5.0050% off standard
Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)$2.00$10.0050% off standard

Prompt Caching: Both Providers Discount Repeated Context

ModelStandard Input / 1MCached Input / 1MDiscount
GPT-6 Luna$0.10$0.0190%
GPT-6.1 Sol$2.00$0.1095%
GPT-6 Astra$10.00$1.0090%
Claude Haiku 5.5$0.10$0.0190%
Claude Sonnet 5.5$2.00$0.1095%
Claude Opus 5.5$4.00$0.2095%
Claude Fable 5.1$10.00$0.2597.5%

Caching is no longer an Anthropic-only advantage: in the mid tier GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 both charge $0.10/M for cached input, while at the top end Claude Opus 5.5 ($0.20/M) and Fable 5.1 ($0.25/M) cache far more cheaply than GPT-6 Astra ($1.00/M). On OpenAI, writing to the cache costs 1.25× the normal input rate.

Context Window Comparison

ModelContext WindowPricing Note
GPT-6 Astra / Sol / Luna1.05M tokensHigher rates above 272K input tokens (2× input, 1.5× output)
Claude Fable 5.1 / Opus 5.5 / Sonnet 5.51M tokensSingle per-token rate
Claude Haiku 5.51M tokensHigher rates above 100K prompt tokens ($0.50/$2.50)

Winner by Use Case

Lowest budget price
Tie
GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5 both cost $0.10/$0.50 for prompts up to 100K tokens.
Budget tier, prompts over 100K
OpenAI (GPT-6 Luna)
Luna stays at $0.10/$0.50; Haiku 5.5 rises to $0.50/$2.50.
Mid-tier list price
Tie
GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 both cost $2 input / $10 output.
Premium tier
Anthropic (Opus 5.5)
$4/$20 vs $10/$50 for GPT-6 Astra — 60% cheaper.
Cached-context apps (mid tier)
Tie
GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 both charge $0.10/M for cached input.
Cached-context apps (premium)
Anthropic (Opus 5.5)
Cached input $0.20/M vs $1.00/M on GPT-6 Astra.
Batch processing
Tie
GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5 batch input both cost $0.05/M.
Very long prompts (>272K)
Anthropic
Claude bills its full 1M context at one rate; GPT-6 charges 2× input above 272K.
Ecosystem & tooling
OpenAI
Assistants, fine-tuning, Azure OpenAI and the widest framework support.

Which Provider Should You Choose?

Choose OpenAI if:

  • Your high-volume workload sends long prompts — above 100K tokens GPT-6 Luna stays at $0.10/$0.50 while Claude Haiku 5.5 rises to $0.50/$2.50
  • You need the OpenAI ecosystem: Assistants, fine-tuning, Azure OpenAI and integrations that default to OpenAI

Choose Anthropic if:

  • You need premium quality at a lower price — Claude Opus 5.5 is 60% cheaper than GPT-6 Astra
  • You send very long prompts to the mid or premium tier — Sonnet, Opus and Fable have one rate for the whole 1M context, while GPT-6 charges more above 272K tokens
  • You are building long-running agents and want Anthropic's tooling and Messages API
  • Your team already runs evaluations showing Claude performs better on your tasks

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OpenAI cheaper than Anthropic in 2026?

Mostly not. GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5 have the same list price ($0.10/$0.50) for prompts up to 100K tokens; above that Luna is cheaper. GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 cost the same ($2/$10), and Claude Opus 5.5 ($4/$20) is cheaper than GPT-6 Astra ($10/$50). The older Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1/$5) is ten times more expensive than either budget model.

Which is better for coding?

Both providers' mid-tier models — GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 — are positioned for coding and agents at the same price, so run a short evaluation on your own repository before committing. For the hardest work, compare Claude Opus 5.5 with GPT-6 Astra: Opus costs less than half as much.

Can I switch between OpenAI and Anthropic?

Yes, with moderate engineering effort. The API formats differ (OpenAI's APIs vs Anthropic's Messages API), but frameworks like LangChain, LlamaIndex and LiteLLM abstract both. Re-run your evals after switching, because prompts tuned for one model rarely transfer perfectly.

Do both support vision / multimodal input?

Yes, both providers' current models accept image input. Image pricing varies by resolution and is charged in addition to text token pricing. Check each provider's current documentation for image pricing specifics.

Compare OpenAI vs Anthropic Cost for Your Volume

Enter your monthly token usage and see exact costs side by side.

Open AI API Cost Calculator